Don’t Dig a Grave for Private Eye Novels

Near the end of 2014 an article in the New York Times magazine carried the ominous title “The Death of the Private Eye”. With a smirk it described how and why the P.I. novel is dead.  Obsolete.  Kaput.

Between you and me, I think the author had been in the sauce.

For starters, he didn’t seem to grasp what the genre’s about. Perhaps that had something to do with the fact he talked about movies and Thomas Pynchon a great deal more than he did giants of the genre such as Chandler and Hammett. At least they got mentioned, unlike more contemporary writers such as Paretsky, Parker, Mickey Spillane, Sue Grafton and others.

The author’s reasoning appears to boil down to this:

1. The Internet and databases have eliminated the need for a P.I. to do anything except sit at his or her computer.

2. Hacker heroes have replaced the now outmoded private eyes.

As to his first argument, Sara Paretsky’s V.I. Warshawski and Cara Black’s Aimee Leduc are just two examples of thoroughly contemporary P.I.’s who show the genre is very much alive and kicking, thank you. They utilize exotic databases, yet they still mix it up in the street. They duck bullets, wheedle information and follow leads they get from sometimes devious and flawed human beings.

Why, if we swallow the author’s first argument, have hacker heroes taken the place of the private eye? Because they are antiheroes with contempt for corrupt institutions, he argues. Because they are venal “yet possessed by a moral authority”. That, he contends, is more important than familiar trappings such as the P.I.’s office, or watering hole, or swagger.

This struck me as simplistic. It also struck me as not truly understanding why readers love private eyes.

I’ll not deny that techie heroes such as Stieg Larsson’s Lisbeth Salander make for a wonderful, page-turning adventure. But I don’t think we should dig a grave for private eye novels just yet.

What do you think?

About mruthmyers

Welcome to the spot for aficionados of the 1940s, strong women protagonists and private eye novels. Shamus Award winning mystery writer M. Ruth Myers, author of the Maggie Sullivan mysteries and other novels, is your host. Share stories of your female relatives on the WW2 homefront. Find new books. Most of all have fun!

Posted on January 28, 2015, in Opinion and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. First of all, hackers are criminals. The internet, while it’s made some things easier to research and find information, it doesn’t catch the criminal. If it did, we wouldn’t need police officers eirher. To catch a criminal you still have to connect the dots: finding missing evidence, finding missing bodies, talking to people, etc… The internet does none of that, but a P.I./Police detective do.

    Like

  2. The author of the Times piece probably does not read ‘pulp fiction’ therefore just does not get it. And, of course, ” I read it on the internet, so it must be true.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: